Search Site
Menu
25 Main Street, Suite 104 | Hackensack, New Jersey 07601
Call For Consultation 551-245-8894
National Origin Discrimination in New Jersey Based on English Only Policies

Given the increasing number of immigrants in the workplace, the volume of discrimination claims based on national origin has risen significantly.  There were over 11,000 charges filed with the EEOC based on national origin discrimination during 2009, which represents more than a 50 percent increase from the previous year.

This rise in discrimination cases based on national origin is largely attributable to employer imposed English-only policies.  The law prohibits employment discrimination based on national origin under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) and Title VII.

When employment decisions are based on factors like ancestry, country of origin, linguistic traits, culture, ethnic surnames or similar characteristics, the affected employee may have the basis for an LAD claim.  This type of claim may include employers that disqualify job applicants based on having an ethnic surname or refuse to permit a non-native speaker with an accent from interacting with the public.

When do English only work rules constitute unlawful discrimination?

An English-only work rule may be the basis for a national origin discrimination claim unless the employer can show it is supported by business necessity.  If an employer imposes an English-only work rule, the employer must specify when English must be spoken, such as in the presence of patrons and any consequences for violating the policy.  If an employer requires English to be spoken constantly, including during break periods, this rule is probably too broad.  Further, when an employer prohibits speaking one language, such as Spanish but permits the use of other languages, this disparate treatment may also be actionable.

The EEOC has justified this policy based on the rationale that a person’s primary language is a fundamental characteristic of his or her national origin.  When an employer prohibits speaking in one’s native tongue, this may promote an environment of inferiority, isolation, and intimidation that could perpetuate a discriminatory work environment.

Imposition of English fluency requirements by New Jersey employers

Employment policies that mandate a certain level of English proficiency also may form the basis for a national origin discrimination claim in New Jersey.  The degree of fluency that may be required depends on the specific needs of the job.  Employers that have standard fluency requirements across a broad range of positions may be determined to have engaged in employment discrimination.

Employment discrimination cases based on mandatory rules regarding the use of English or minimum levels of proficiency are complex because these policies are permissible under specific circumstances.  Cases of national origin discrimination require careful analysis of the requirements of the position and the scope and intrusiveness of the policy.

Neil H. Deutsch On G+

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Neil  H.  Deutsch Attorney Photo
Neil H. Deutsch
Senior Partner

About Neil H. Deutsch has been practicing law for over 35 years and is known as a skilled negotiator in employment and discrimination law. He believes in a bottom-line approach of risk analysis and cost effectiveness for his clients. "Case evaluation is something we take seriously," says Mr. Deutsch who seeks top net dollar for…

Bruce  L.  Atkins Attorney Photo
Bruce L. Atkins
Senior Partner

About Bruce L. Atkins is regarded as one of New Jersey's premiere practitioners of employment and civil litigation. Mr. Atkins has also been included in the Thomson Reuters list of New Jersey Super Lawyers* in Employment Litigation since 2005. Mr. Atkins believes employees have rights that should be aggressively pursued when an employer has wrongfully dealt…

Adam  J.  Kleinfeldt Attorney Photo
Adam J. Kleinfeldt
Partner

About Adam J. Kleinfeldt joined Deutsch Atkins, P.C. in March of 2015.  He primarily represents individuals in employment litigations such as discrimination, retaliation, and whistle blowing matters.  He has extensive experience in all phases of the litigation process. Adam has obtained significant results for some of his clients, including a $525,000 jury verdict in a…

Robert  J.  Pantina Attorney Photo
Robert J. Pantina
Attorney

About Robert J. Pantina joined the firm in 2018. Mr. Pantina received his B.A. from Rider University in 2008. He received his J.D. from the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University in 2017. While in law school, Mr. Pantina interned for the Hon. Bonnie J. Mizdol, Assignment Judge of the Superior Court of…

Diane  Englander  Peyser Attorney Photo
Diane Englander Peyser
Attorney

About Diane Englander Peyser joined Deutsch Atkins, PC in September 2018 where she represents employees in wrongful termination, retaliation, harassment, and discrimination matters. Prior to joining Deutsch Atkins, PC, Diane represented clients in all aspects of employment law on behalf of employees involving unemployment appeals, claims of sexual harassment, LGBT discrimination, disability discrimination, FMLA, New…

AWARDS & AFFILIATIONS
Reviews and Ratings
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    No description provided

    Read more

    Partner

  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    No description provided

    Read more

    Partner

  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    No description provided

    Read more

    Partner

  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    No description provided

    Read more

    Sole Practitioner

  • lawyers
    4.4/5.0

    No description provided

    Read more

    Partner

See all reviews
Contact us

Quick Contact Form